How GhostLogic Works
AI moves. GhostLogic records.
The system does not need to predict which action will matter later. It captures supported activity continuously, seals it as it happens, and keeps it somewhere the machine under question can’t reach — so the evidence already exists when the question arrives.
The pipeline
Seven stages between activity and answer.
Each stage exists for one reason: so that what the record says later is decided by what happened, not by whoever tells the story best.
Capture
Record supported events from computers, applications, networks and AI-agent activity.
Capture runs continuously, not on suspicion. Most forensic gaps exist because recording started after the incident — GhostLogic removes that failure mode by recording before anyone knows there will be an incident. What is captured is what the deployment supports and discloses; nothing is inferred or backfilled.
Normalize
Convert different sources into a common ordered event structure.
An endpoint log, a browser event and an AI-agent action all describe the world differently. Normalization puts them into one ordered structure so that a single timeline can hold all of them — and so an event from one source can be checked against the others instead of living in its own silo.
Seal
Hash and chain the record so later alteration becomes detectable.
Each record is hashed and bound to the records before it. Change one entry after the fact — edit it, delete it, reorder it — and the chain no longer verifies. Sealing does not make the record unchangeable; it makes any change visible. That distinction is the honest one, and it is the one that matters under scrutiny.
Preserve
Keep the evidence outside the system that produced it.
A machine that has been compromised cannot be trusted to guard the record of its own compromise. Evidence is anchored off-host, in more than one place, so the source system never holds the only surviving copy. Whoever controls the endpoint does not control the history.
Reconstruct
Build the timeline from the surviving evidence and disclose where continuity is incomplete.
Reconstruction returns one ordered, inspectable timeline — and it says so plainly when part of the record is missing. A gap is reported as a gap, never papered over. What you read is what survived, in the order it happened, with the seams shown.
TICS
TICS evaluates timestamp continuity, recording gaps, clock changes and evidence-chain integrity.
Evidence is only as good as its own condition, so GhostLogic grades the record itself. TICS asks the questions an opposing examiner would ask: Is the clock consistent? Did recording stop, and when? Does the chain verify end to end? The answer is reported as one of three states:
The available record supports continuity and integrity.
The record contains conditions that require review.
The record contains material integrity or continuity problems.
The state describes the record’s condition — it is a finding about the evidence, not a verdict about anyone’s intent.
The result
An ordered record showing what the evidence supports, what it does not support, and where the gaps are.
Three honest categories, clearly separated. That separation is the product: most tools blur supported and unsupported claims together, and the blur is where disputes live.
Not just an alert
Not just an AI explanation
Not just a pile of logs
A record you can hand to someone who doesn’t believe you.
An alert tells you something happened. An AI explanation tells you a story. A pile of logs tells you to go find out yourself. GhostLogic returns an ordered record showing what the evidence supports, what it does not support, and where the gaps are — built to be inspected by someone whose job is to doubt it.
Evidence survives
Know exactly what happened.
Start with one system, agent, fleet, or workflow.
Talk with GhostLogic